[caption id="attachment_149037" align="alignright" width="181"] Figure 1: A five-story mural depicting the Prophet Muhammads celestial ascension, in Tehran, Iran, in 2008. CHRISTIANE GRUBER[/caption]
Anew filmabout the Prophet Muhammad is slotted to have its debut this Sunday at the Fajr International Film Festival in Tehran.Directed by Majid Majidi, the biopics cost has exceeded $30 million, making it the most expensive Iranian movie shot to date. Well before its release, the film was the subject of criticism due to the physical presence of Muhammad on screen. Although the Prophets facial features are camouflaged through light and shade strategies, the Sunni clerics at al-Azhar in Cairo nevertheless attempted tohalt its releaseso that an undistorted image of the Prophet can be preserved in the minds of Muslims."
This latest disagreement over filmic portrayals of Muhammad reveals ongoing anxieties regarding visual representations of the Prophet in the Islamic world. However, such divergences do not appear to be based on sectarian grounds, as the movie covers Muhammads childhood until the age of 12. Sunni and Shii debates over the life of the Prophet tend to revolve around the events of his adulthood, especially whether he appointed Ali, his cousin and son-in-law, as his rightful successor. As Majidi himself has noted, the film purposefully skirts these sectarian debates over the life of the Prophet in order to present a positive and united presentation of Muhammad to international movie audiences.
This new Muhammad film does not emerge out of thin air. In addition to earlier movies (like AkkadsThe Message) and others still in the making (by Qatar), Majidis large-scale project is part of an effort to visually reclaim the Prophet and his legacy in Iran that has been under way since the Danish cartoons of 2005. While reactions to the cartoons in some Arab, Sunni and especially Salafi quarters includedissuing of decreesstipulating that images of prophets are disrespectful and caricatures of them blasphemous,"a vastly different response has unfolded within Iran over the past decade. Indeed, Iran has launched a number of artistic, educational and public relations projects since 2006, itself dubbed byAyatollah KhameneiThe Year of the Noble Prophet."As a result, celebratory depictions of the Prophet have emerged in full force, with Majidis film the latest outcome of these officially sanctioned endeavors.
Among them, one of the most visible Iranian responses to the Danish cartoons is a colorful mural depicting Muhammads celestial ascension, which was painted in 2008 on a five-story building located on a major thoroughfare in central Tehran (Figure 1). Sponsored by Tehrans municipality, the mural beautifies the capital citys urban space much like the vibrant and sometime surreal compositions by Iranian artistMehdi Ghadyanloo.Notably missing here are portraits of ayatollahs Khomeini and Khamenei, as well as Palestinian and Iranian martyrs. In their stead appears a pictorial eulogy of the Prophet based on a 15th-century manuscriptpainting.While the original illustration shows Muhammads facial features, the contemporary mural renders his face as if a blank slate. This erasure of the Prophets facial features most likely is because the image is in the public domain instead of tucked inside a private manuscript. It is also a likely result of the more reactionary and intransigent Muslim responses to images of Muhammad in the wake of the Danish cartoon controversy.
Besides this mega-mural, a number of other Prophet-centered products have been made for the Iranian market since 2006. Targeting a juvenile audience in particular, a series of illustrated books written in simple prose and verse aims to teach children about Muhammads life and miracles. These books include images of the Prophet, who often is depicted with a veiled face and solar halo, as can be seen in one image in which he is shown extending his arms to receive revelations at Mount Hira (Figure 2). The text that accompanies the colorful illustration informs its young readers that Muhammad was like the summer sun and the full moon, emitting both light and enlightenment into the world.
[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="512"] Figure 2: The Prophet Muhammad receives revelations on Mount Hira in an illustration from the childrens book Greetings, Rose of Muhammad, Tehran, 2006. GREETINGS, ROSE OF MUHAMMAD[/caption]
Just like these Iranian childrens books, Majidis film takes up the question of childhood. The films major scenes indubitably will reiterate some of the more famous episodes of the Prophets youth, including his highly auspicious birth and his being recognized as a prophet by the Christian monk Bahira. Visually depicting these pivotal moments of Muhammads early life is by no means a new phenomenon in Persian lands. Indeed, from 1300 CE onward a number of manuscript paintings represent Muhammads birth as a luminous, angelic event (Figure 3). The texts that buttress these images inform us that, when he was born, Muhammad illuminated the entire world with his cosmic radiance, which rose upward to set the heavens and stars alight.
[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="427"] Figure 3: A radiant Muhammad is born and held aloft by angels in Hafiz-i Abru's Quintessence of Histories.FREER/SACKLER, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION[/caption]
Persian illustrated manuscripts also depict Muhammads foretelling as a prophet at the tender age of 12, when he visited the city of Busra in Syria. It is at this time that the Christian monk Bahira recognized the signs of the young boys future prophethood through a series of natural phenomena, like the bending of a trees branches and/or a cloud providing him with shade, as well as the seal of prophecy mark imprinted on Muhammads body (Figure 4). The latter episode belongs to a corpus of Islamic narratives that relate that the Prophet was announced and foretold as a prophet by a Christian holy man, who had read about his coming in the Bible.
[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="440"] Figure 4: The young Muhammad is recognized as a prophet by the Christian monk Bahira in Rashid al-Din's Compendium of Histories. UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH[/caption]
The story of Muhammads youthful seal of prophecy recognition is a popular one across Islamic lands even today. Over the course of the 20th century, a number of mass-produced images of the young Muhammadcomposed in a wide array of creative variantswere made in Iran. These appeared in banners, posters (Figure 5), postcards, carpets and stickers until they were banned in 2008.
[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="338"] Figure 5: The young Muhammad, identified as Muhammad, the Messenger of God, on a poster made in Iran in the 1990s. VICTORIA AND ALBERT MUSEUM[/caption]
While the recent Iranian prohibition of these images is certainly a response to the Danish cartoon controversy, it also emanates from the discovery of its original pictorial source: an early20th-century Orientalist photograph of a young Arab boy.Along with the anxieties brought about by this borrowed image, severe security concerns in the immediate aftermath of the attack onCharlie Hebdocaused the Victoria and Albert Museum to attempt to dissimulate its possession of one of thesemodern Iranian images of the young Muhammad.
Not shying away from depicting this pivotal moment in the Prophets youth, Majidi in his biopic shows the young Muhammad arriving at Bahiras monastery (Figure 6). In this film still, the adolescent protagonist walks down the main aisle of a church as a burst of sunlight streams in from the open doors. This radiance symbolic of Muhammads future prophecy floods into the interior space and overwhelms his facial features. This carefully designed visual strategy allows the Prophet to be both visible and invisiblerepresented and unrepresentedall at once.
[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="564"] Figure 6: In a still from the film "Muhammad, the Messenger of God," the young Muhammad enters a monastery, where he is recognized as a prophet by the Christian monk Bahira. "MUHAMMAD, THE MESSENGER OF GOD"[/caption]
These paintings, murals, childrens books and films about the Prophet that have been made in Iran since 2006 are illuminating in several ways. First, they show that traditions of representing Muhammad are still well and alive in some areas of the Muslim world. These still and moving images aim to commemorate the Prophet, present his status and legacy in a positive light, and teach a variety of audiences about his life and miracles.
Unlike in Sunni-Salafi spheres, in which recent responses to the Danish and Charlie Hebdocartoons have largely comprised a flurry of obdurate injunctions, the response in Iran has been markedly different. Indeed, rather than shying away from or banning images of the Prophet, Iranian leaders, artists and filmmakers have harnessed the creative arts to recover and restore the image of Muhammad in the public domain.
Such images serve as powerful reminders that there is no universally accepted ban on the figural arts in Islam and that traditions of prophetic representation still continue to flourish in Iran today. Above all, they highlight the fact that in Islamic lands there exist two diametrically opposed reactions to defamatory European cartoons: While some actors engage in censorship and suppression, others actively seek the promulgation of the Prophet Muhammad by reasserting the positive power of picture-making.