Democracy Now!- The State Department has announced new sanctions against Iran over alleged support for terrorism and Irans ballistic missile program. The move will blacklist 18 people accused of having ties to Irans military, freezing any of their U.S. assets. The new U.S. sanctions came just after the Trump administration begrudgingly certified that Iran has complied with its obligations under the Obama-brokered nuclear agreement. According to the magazine Foreign Policy, Trump has instructed a group of trusted White House staffers to make the potential case for withholding certification of Iran at the next 90-day review of the nuclear deal. We speak to Ervand Abrahamian, a retired professor of history at Baruch College, City University of New York. He is the author of several books, including "The Coup: 1953, theCIA, and the Roots of Modern U.S.-Iranian Relations."
Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
JUANGONZLEZ:The State Department has announced new sanctions against Iran over allegedly supporting terrorism and the countrys ballistic missile program. The move will blacklist 18 people accused of having ties to Irans military, freezing any of their U.S. assets. The new U.S. sanctions came just after the Trump administration begrudgingly certified that Iran has complied with its obligations under the Obama-brokered nuclear agreement. According to the magazineForeign Policy, Trump has instructed a group of his trusted White House staffers to make the potential case for withholding certification of Iran at the next 90-day review of the nuclear deal.
AMYGOODMAN:The move was made after President Trump reportedly had a contentious meeting with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who recertified Irans compliance with the nuclear deal. As a presidential candidate, Donald Trump promised to rip up the Iran nuclear deal, calling it the worst deal ever.
Well, for more, were joined by Ervand Abrahamian. He is a retired professor of history at Baruch College, City University of New York, author of several books, includingThe Coup: 1953, theCIA, and the Roots of Modern U.S.-Iranian Relations.
We welcome you toDemocracy Now!
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Thank you.
AMYGOODMAN:Start off by responding to what just happened last week, Trump certifying the deal and then saying hes increasing sanctions and now looking how to sanction Iran more.
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Well, to borrow his own word, its sad. Well, what it really is, an incoherent policy. The ideaof course, before, he was going to tear up the whole agreement, and hes discovered its much more complicated than that. Its an agreement between Iran and not just United States, but really the major economies of the world. And if the U.S. wants to say they pull out or even add sanctions, what Iran will do is just go ahead with its own policy of trying to improve relations with Europe. And it already has good relations with China and Russia. So, the net result, I think, will be the loss for large revenues for United States corporations, because once Iran begins to produce a lot of income from gas, it will sign contracts with the Europeans, the Chinese, Russians, and the U.S. corporations are going to be left out in the cold.
JUANGONZLEZ:And the significance of several members of his own administration pushing back on the president, on his campaign promises around Iran?
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Yes, I mean, on both sides. I mean, there was hope, I would guess, from the extreme right, that he would really tear up the whole agreement. Thats not going to work, because now hes in there. He knows that agreement is actually a very good agreement for the United States, as well as for Iran. But then there are others who are arguing, I think, that it would be better to have good relations, or at least normal relations, because there would be an opening for U.S. businesses there.
AMYGOODMAN:And what do you make ofand, again, you know, we dont have original sources on this, but this conflict between Rex Tillerson, the formerCEOof ExxonMobil, who is the secretary of state and has had many dealings with Iran
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Yeah.
AMYGOODMAN:over the yearsright?asCEOof ExxonMobil
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Yeah, yeah.
AMYGOODMAN:versus Trump?
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Yeah, Im sure he sees it from Exxons point of view, that if Exxon isnt in the running, there are other companies, like Total has already signed a major agreement. If not Total, a Chinese company or Shell. So its really a question of die-hard business interests versus some sort of incoherent ideology.
JUANGONZLEZ:And, of course, oil has always been at the center of Western policy toward Iran. And youve written about some recently released documents that date back to the 1953 coup of the
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Yeah.
JUANGONZLEZ:organized by theCIAagainst the democratically elected leader of Iran.
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Yeah.
JUANGONZLEZ:Could you talk about that and also why its taken so long for these latest documents to be released?
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Well, as you say, its so long ago. And actually, according to rulestheres a 30-year rule, so documents that arecould be released are. Its taken three decades of beyond that before the State Department released these. Its like pulling teeth out of someone. And the reason, when you look at it, is thatwell, there are two reasons. One is that what the documents show is actually the importance of oil in the coup. The conventional wisdom is, oh, it was all the Cold War scare, communism. But here you see, actually, very occasionally, when Eisenhower intervenes in a discussion, its about question of oil contracts and so on and how nationalization would disrupt the whole international framework and would be a threat to U.S. interests, oil interests, elsewhere.
But another, I think, reason they have been so reluctant to publish these documents is that it shows how involved the U.S. Embassy was, the ambassador, in internal Iranian affairs. Its like looking at an imperial power in a semi-colonial situation. The ambassador acts basically like a viceroy, involved in many different internal policy. He often says, "Oh, of course, its not my business to be involved in internal policy," but then he goes ahead and, in fact, does get involved.
And the astounding discovery, I was surprised, is howCIAwas involved in the elections that were held in 1952 during the Mosaddegh period. And what their strategy was to undermine Mosaddegh through Parliament. And a lot of money went into basically getting what theCIAthought would be their favorable candidates elected. And this we didnt know before. But then you would see also that when they talk about, well, we need to get rid of Mosaddegh, they have 18 candidates the U.S. discusses who is suitable to have the next
AMYGOODMAN:But when you talk about what wasnt known and what was, youre a professor, but most people dont even know what was known, was the deep U.S.-CIAinvolvement
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Yeah, yeah.
AMYGOODMAN:with Allen Dulles, the brother of John Foster DullesAllen Dulles, head of the CIA
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Yeah.
AMYGOODMAN:John Foster Dulles, secretary of statewho, togetherand then, of course, theres Eisenhower
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Yeah.
AMYGOODMAN:and others who engineer this coup, using Teddy Roosevelts grandson, Kermit Roosevelt
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Yeah.
AMYGOODMAN:as the bag guy, the guy who comes with bags of money and actually overthrows Mohammad Mosaddegh, the democratically elected leader.
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Yeah. But, actually, even there, what wethe conventional wisdom was you had the Truman administration, and then, when Eisenhower came in, the machinery is put for the coup, and it was the Eisenhower administration, with Kermit Roosevelt and Dulles, doing it. What these documents show, which is astounding, before Eisenhower, under the Truman administration, there was actually a deep state. And the deep state in theCIAwere exactly Dulles and Kermit Roosevelt. They were in charge of the Iran desk in theCIA, longfrom 1951, long before the Eisenhower. So they were pushing for real action in Iran before Eisenhower came in. And they were working very closely with the British before the Eisenhower administration.
AMYGOODMAN:And they tried to get Kermit Roosevelt to do the same thing the next year, in 1954, in Guatemala. He refused, but they did it anyway and overthrew the democratically elected leader in Guatemala, rbenz.
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
AMYGOODMAN:And when we hear discussions today about Russia interfering with our elections, I think its very important for people to understand U.S. history.
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Yeah.
AMYGOODMAN:Let me ask you a last question aboutThe New York Timeslast month naming the so-called dark prince to run the Iran operations, signaling a tougher stance,The New York Timesreporting Michael DAndrea now running the CIAs Iran operations. He oversaw the hunt for Osama bin Laden, American drone strike campaign, that kills thousands of Islamist militants and hundreds of civilians. Your thoughts when you heard this and the anger of the Trump administration of revealing his name?
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:I dont know the politics of that, really. I think, again, theyre very confused about what to do with Iran. And this is a reflection of that.
JUANGONZLEZ:Im just wondering if, in the documentsweve got about 30 secondsyou can across the name of Donald Wilhelm at all, who was aCIAguy who went to Iran after, after the overthrow of Mosaddegh, and who was actually the mayorsMayor Bill de Blasios uncle?
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:Yeah, he actually co-ghostwrote the shahs memoirs.
JUANGONZLEZ:Yes.
ERVANDABRAHAMIAN:It would be interesting to know something aboutmore about the family history. I dont think there would be much political discussions between this part of the family and that part. He was kind of aCIAacademic.
AMYGOODMAN:Well, we will leave it there. Ervand Abrahamian, thanks so much for being with us, retired professor of history at Baruch College, City University of New York.