The ship, the Maersk Tigris, with 24 crew members, was intercepted by IslamicRevolutionary GuardsCorps patrol boats on Tuesday morning while traveling through theStrait of Hormuz, a Pentagon official said. The Iranian forces fired shots across the ships bow, the official said, after its captain declined an order by the forces to divert farther into Iranian waters.
The official said the ship was traveling through an internationally recognized maritime route. After being fired on, it issued a distress call, prompting theUnited States Navyto direct a destroyer, the Farragut, to the area and to put aircraft on standby to monitor the situation.
The episode threatened fragile negotiations over reining inIrans nuclear ambitions, but American officials were quick to play down its significance, correcting initial reports out of Iran that it had seized a United States ship. The Marshall Islands, in the Pacific, have been independent of the United States since 1986 but have a free association relationship with the country.
Col. Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman, said the ship was traveling through Iranian territorial waters that are, by international agreement, open to foreign ships making an innocent passage. He said it was inappropriate for Iran to have fired warning shots, but he added that it was too early to know whether Irans intervention was a violation of international navigation freedom. Iran has in the past threatened to block the strait, a route for much of the worlds oil.
An American military official said Tuesday that the Farragut was about 60 miles away from the site of the episode, and that as of the afternoon there had been no communication between theUnited States Navyand Iran.
A Maersk spokesman said that the ship was a charter vessel, not a Maersk-crewed ship. A spokesman for the charter company, Rickmers Shipmanagement, said that the crew members were all Eastern European or Asian, and that the ship had been headed to a port near Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates, from Jidda, Saudi Arabia. It was carrying general cargo, anything from food to machinery to electronics, he said.
The Rickmers spokesman, Cor Radings, said the captain had said that the ship did not stray into Iranian waters outside the international maritime route. She was stopped by the Iranians and instructed to go to a rendezvous point in Iranian waters, he said. Since then weve lost contact with the ship.
The Maersk spokesman, Michael Storgaard, said in an email that he could not recall another episode in which a Maersk vessel had been detained by the Iranian authorities. Seizure in open sea by authorities? he said. I cannot exclude it has happened before, but would believe we have to go back to World War II.
Maersk said Tuesday evening that the ship was being escorted toward Bandar Abbas, Iran, by Iranian patrol boats.
The episode raised tensions between the United States and the Iranians, who last week turned back a naval convoy suspected of carrying weapons bound for Shiite rebels in Yemen after the American military sent an aircraft carrier group to waters off the coast. That confrontation came weeks after world powers and Iran reached a tentative agreement in which Tehran would drastically cut its enrichment of uranium in exchange for an easing of sanctions.
But officials must still work out the final details of the agreement, and another naval confrontation would make selling a deal even harder.
To maintain political support for a deal, President Obama has to remain vigilant about Iranian behavior in the region, said Cliff Kupchan, the chairman of the Eurasia Group, a consulting firm that assesses political risk around the world. He said that he found Irans seizure of the Maersk ship surprisingly incendiary and that it could be a result of Iranian pique over the show of American naval power last week.
The Iranian elite is extremely concerned about saving face and gaining leverage, Mr. Kupchan said. This was probably an attempt to level the playing field.
By The New York Times
# Tags
